voted.nz People Votes About ☰
People Votes About

End of Life Choice Bill — In Committee — Part 3 — Update definition of 'Medical Ethicist'

11 September, 2019

Summary

This Supplementary Order Paper amends Supplementary Order Paper No 259 amending the End of Life Choice Bill by clarifying what is required in relation to a “medical ethicist” (as that term is used in the proposed legislation).

The question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 340 in the name of Chris Penk to the proposed amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 259 in the name of David Seymour to clause 20 be agreed to.

Mover of amendment

Photo of Chris Penk
Chris Penk
National Party, Helensville

Votes Not passed by a modest majority

Amendment to the amendment not agreed to.

Personal Vote

This was a personal vote (or conscience vote) which meant MPs could decide how to vote on their own, rather than having to follow the party position. Learn more on the official Parliament website.

50 Voted For




70 Voted Against





External References

This work is based on Member of Parliament data from the Office of the Clerk and Parliamentary Services which is licensed by the Clerk of the House of Representatives and/or the Parliamentary Corporation on behalf of Parliamentary Service for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. Full licence available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

It also includes public domain content such as voting information from the Parliamentary debates (Hansard) and information about Government Bills.

Image of Chris Penk (resized, cropped) by The New Zealand National Party, used with permission.

All original material is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. Full licence available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.